Group norms, threat, and children's racial prejudice.
نویسندگان
چکیده
To assess predictions from social identity development theory (SIDT; Nesdale, 2004) concerning children's ethnic/racial prejudice, 197 Anglo-Australian children ages 7 or 9 years participated in a minimal group study as a member of a team that had a norm of inclusion or exclusion. The team was threatened or not threatened by an out-group that was of the same or different race. Consistent with SIDT, prejudice was greater when the in-group had a norm of exclusion and there was threat from the out-group. Norms and threat also interacted with participant age to influence ethnic attitudes, although prejudice was greatest when the in-group had an exclusion norm and there was out-group threat. The implications of the findings for SIDT are discussed.
منابع مشابه
Social norms and self-presentation: children's implicit and explicit intergroup attitudes.
Two studies examined whether social norms and children's concern for self-presentation affect their intergroup attitudes. Study 1 examined racial intergroup attitudes and normative beliefs among children aged 6 to 16 years (n=155). Accountability (i.e., public self-focus) was experimentally manipulated, and intergroup attitudes were assessed using explicit and implicit measures. Study 2 (n = 13...
متن کاملSocial structural position and prejudice: an exploration of cross-national differences in regression slopes
Group-threat theorists suggest that increases in the collective threat posed to dominant ethnic and racial groups increase average levels of prejudice and intensify the relationships between individual characteristics and prejudice. However, group-threat theorists focus attention more on differences in the average levels of prejudice across geographic regions and/or time than on differences in ...
متن کاملThe development of intergroup bias in childhood: how social norms can shape children's racial behaviours.
The present research examined the developmental course of racial behaviours in childhood. It tested the hypothesis that White children's expressions of racial prejudice do not necessarily decline in middle childhood due to the development of particular cognitive skills but that instead, as argued by the socio-normative approach, children older than seven will go on expressing prejudiced attitud...
متن کاملExplaining dehumanization among children: the interspecies model of prejudice.
Although many theoretical approaches have emerged to explain prejudices expressed by children, none incorporate outgroup dehumanization, a key predictor of prejudice among adults. According to the Interspecies Model of Prejudice, beliefs in the human-animal divide facilitate outgroup prejudice through fostering animalistic dehumanization (Costello & Hodson, 2010). In the present investigation, ...
متن کاملPrejudice and Politics: Symbolic Racism Versus Racial Threats to the Good Life
moralistic resentments of blacks— what we have called symbolic racism— proved to be the overriding determinant of voting, for whites shielded from possible tangible threats posed by blacks as well as for those in more imminent jeopardy. At the same time, and in direct contradiction of realistic group conflict theory, direct racial threats to whites' private lives were largely irrelevant, either...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Child development
دوره 76 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005